Access advice to guide your steps
Ask most people why members are leaving industry funds for self-managed super, and you'll usually get the same answer: “they want to buy property.” It's a convenient story. It's also mostly wrong, or at least, it's only ever been part of the picture.
We're seeing the same shift with our own clients, and when we dig into what's actually driving it, property rarely comes up first. What comes up first is transparency, or the lack of it.
Here's something a lot of industry fund members don't realise until it's pointed out to them: the return you see on your statement isn't your return. It's the return of the investment option you're sitting in, priced as a unit across everyone in that option, at that time.
That distinction matters more than it sounds. Because your fund is a pooled vehicle, your personal tax position isn't calculated against your own assets, it's smoothed across the whole pool through unit pricing. That includes something as significant as the shift from accumulation phase to pension phase. In a pooled fund, that transition is handled at the fund level, not calculated precisely against your own holdings. In your own fund, it is.
None of this makes pooled funds bad, for a lot of people, the simplicity and cost of a pooled structure is exactly right. But for members who want to know precisely what they own, precisely what return they're getting, and precisely how their own tax position is being managed, a pooled fund structurally can't give them that. It was never designed to.
The commentary around SMSFs has been dominated by property for so long that it's become shorthand for the whole decision. But talk to people who've actually made the move, and the theme that comes up again and again isn't bricks and mortar – it's wanting to know exactly what they're invested in and why.
That's a different conversation. It's about being able to look at a portfolio and say “I own this specific share, this specific bond, this specific asset” rather than “I own units in an option that owns a share of a pool that owns a share of thousands of underlying holdings I've never seen listed.” For a growing number of members, that lack of line-of-sight, not the absence of a rental property, is the actual problem.
This is the part that often gets missed. Direct ownership, full visibility of your actual return, and precise tax treatment on your own assets aren't exclusive to SMSFs, modern retail platforms can offer most of this too, with far less of the administrative and trustee burden that comes with running your own fund.
If what you're chasing is transparency and control, a retail platform may get you there without you having to take on trustee obligations, annual audits, and the compliance responsibility that sits with an SMSF trustee. For a lot of members, that's the better fit.
Where SMSFs tend to earn their place is at scale. Once a balance is large enough, the fixed costs of running your own fund, audit, admin, accounting, can work out cheaper than percentage-based fees on a pooled or platform structure, and you get full trustee control on top of that. Below that threshold, the maths usually favours a retail platform instead.
|
Feature |
Industry Fund |
Retail Platform |
SMSF |
|
See your own investment return (not just the fund's) |
No - pooled, unit-priced |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Choose the underlying assets directly |
No - limited to pre-set options |
Yes, from platform menu |
Yes, virtually unlimited |
|
Tax calculated against your own position |
No - smoothed across the pool |
Largely |
Yes, precisely |
|
Ongoing admin & compliance burden |
None (fund handles it) |
Low |
Higher - trustee duties apply |
|
Typically cost-effective at |
Any balance |
Small - mid balances |
Larger balances |
This isn't a fringe movement. Industry-wide data now shows industry funds recording consecutive quarters of net member outflows, with retail funds and SMSFs the main beneficiaries of that shift. It's a meaningful reversal of the pattern that held for years, and it lines up with exactly what we're hearing directly from clients: this is about visibility and control, not a single asset class.
If any of this sounds familiar, you're not sure what your actual return is, you don't know exactly what you own, or you're wondering whether your balance has reached the point where an SMSF or a retail platform might genuinely serve you better, that's exactly the kind of question worth a conversation before a decision. Get in touch with us and we'll walk through what your options actually look like for your situation.
This website may contain general advice, but does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider whether the advice is suitable for you and your personal circumstances. Before you make any decision about whether to acquire a certain product, you should obtain and read the relevant product disclosure statement. In the event that Funded Futures Financial Services is providing personal advice it will be communicated via a ‘statement of advice’.
Funded Futures Financial Planning ABN 81 646 656 804 T/A Funded Futures Financial Services is a Corporate Authorised Representatives and is authorised through Cobalt Advisers Pty Ltd ABN 64 628 654 099 who is an Australian Financial Services Licencee # 512550.