Access advice to guide your steps

More Changes to DIV296 the Second Super Tax

A “second super tax” takes shape: what’s changing with Div 296

The government’s flagship reform to high-balance superannuation accounts is the Div 296 tax, intended to apply to individuals with total superannuation balances (TSB) above $3 million. Originally the design introduced a 15 % additional tax on earnings (including unrealised gains) attributed to the portion of a balance above $3 m.
However, under recent industry and political pressure the government appears to be modifying both the formula and mechanics of how the tax will operate.

Key reforms under review

Here are the most important changes now on the table:

  • Taxing only realised earnings
Rather than including “paper” or unrealised gains. Earlier versions of Div 296 captured asset-value increases even if an asset had not been sold.
  • Introducing a higher threshold or tiered tax rate
Above $10 million. One media report says balances between $3 m-$10 m could face a 30 % tax rate, while balances above $10 m would jump to 40 %.
  • Indexing the $3 m threshold to inflation
The lack of indexation was a major criticism (leading to “bracket creep” for more Australians). Indexing is now under consideration.
  • Implementation deferred
The earliest start date was 1 July 2025, but commentary suggests the measurement date may now shift to 1 July 2026 or beyond, giving affected individuals more time to plan.

Why it matters (and how it may affect you)

For individuals (including SMSF trustees) with superannuation balances approaching or above $3 million, these changes introduce considerable strategic implications:

  • Valuation / liquidity risks
If unrealised gains remain in scope, members anchored in illiquid assets (property, unlisted companies) face the risk of paying tax on gains they haven’t realised — potentially forcing asset sales.
  • Bracket creep risk
Without indexation, ordinary growth in super balances could pull more members into the tax net over time.
  • Planning window
Because the tax is still not law, and the start date may be deferred, there is a window to review asset allocation, super balances, and withdrawal/contribution strategies — but any moves should be carefully considered given potential unintended consequences.
  • Interpretation & compliance complexity
Even under the existing design draft, the formula for “earnings” and the “proportion” of earnings attributable to the above-$3 m portion is quite technical.
Cartoon of Jim Chalmers' doing a backflip on DIV296

While the core concept of Div 296 remains — an extra tax on superannuation earnings for those with high balances — the mechanics are shifting under pressure. The government appears to be responding to industry concerns around fairness (unrealised gains), indexing, and implementation timing. For those likely impacted, this is not a reason to ignore the reform: rather, it signals the time to engage with advisors, update strategy, and model scenarios under both the original and revised proposals.

Latest News

Speak to one of our advisors today

Call Us
1300 003 337

Contact Us

21/193-203 South Pine Road
Brendale QLD 4500
contactus@fundedfutures.com.au
Call Us
1300 003 337

This website may contain general advice, but does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider whether the advice is suitable for you and your personal circumstances. Before you make any decision about whether to acquire a certain product, you should obtain and read the relevant product disclosure statement. In the event that Funded Futures Financial Services is providing personal advice it will be communicated via a ‘statement of advice’.

Funded Futures Financial Planning ABN 81 646 656 804 T/A Funded Futures Financial Services is a Corporate Authorised Representatives and is authorised through Cobalt Advisers Pty Ltd ABN 64 628 654 099 who is an Australian Financial Services Licencee # 512550.

© 2024 Funded Futures | All Rights Reserved | Developed byweb design brisbane